Go to main content

Russia and the United States: Main perpetrators of civilian harm caused by airstrikes

Explosive weapons
International

Russian President Putin and US President Biden met on Wednesday 16 June in Geneva. Humanity & Inclusion (HI) reminds that Russia and the US are among the main perpetrators of civilian harm caused by airstrikes.

© HI

According to Action on Armed Violence, the United-States-led coalition, the Saudi-led coalition, Syria and Russia are key perpetrators of civilian harm from airstrikes since 2011.

“US-led and NATO airstrikes have been the deadliest this decade. Combined, their airstrikes in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria and Yemen had 7,391 civilian casualties – with an extremely high fatality rate of 71%.

In Syria, many airstrikes were conducted by Russian forces or with the support of Russian forces: Russia is responsible for at least 3,968 civilian casualties in Syria, according to AOAV.”

Anne Héry, HI Advocacy Director

Bombing in populated areas: A major humanitarian issue

The use of explosive weapons in urban areas, including airstrikes, has systematic humanitarian consequences for civilian populations. Between 2011 and 2020, 91% of victims of explosive weapons in populated areas were civilians.

Explosive weapons kill and injure civilians, cause severe psychological trauma, destroy vital infrastructure such as schools, health centres and roads, and force people to flee their homes. Bombing also leaves behind explosive remnants of war that threaten the lives of civilians long after fighting is over. It is more vital than ever to adopt a strong political declaration to protect civilians.

Final stage of a diplomatic process

The draft of an international agreement against the use of explosive weapons in populated areas is at its final negotiation stage between states, UN agencies, international organisations and civil society. A final round of negotiations will be held next autumn. Then, the international agreement is expected to be finalised by the end of 2021.

This diplomatic process started in October 2019. So far, more than 70 States have been involved.

The Secretary-General of the United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross, called States to avoid any use of explosive weapons with wide area effects in populated areas. This would create a presumption against the use of heavy explosive weapons.

“Both Russia and the United States must be more supportive and together with other states develop a strong political declaration. This political declaration must change policies and practices of all militaries to better protect civilians from explosive weapons in populated areas.” says Anne Héry, HI Advocacy Director.

Date published: 22/06/21

COUNTRIES

Where we work

Read more

"No safe recovery": New report on Iraq and explosive weapons
© F. Vergnes/HI
Explosive weapons

"No safe recovery": New report on Iraq and explosive weapons

Published on 13th October, Humanity & Inclusion’s report “No safe recovery: The impact of Explosive Ordnance contamination on affected populations in Iraq” paints a harrowing picture of the daily lives of Iraqis.

Disaster Risk Reduction: a growing humanitarian need
© Benoit Almeras/HI
Emergency Prevention

Disaster Risk Reduction: a growing humanitarian need

The frequency and intensity of disasters from natural hazards is steadily increasing. Research shows that vulnerable populations and low-income countries suffer the greatest consequences.

“Our goal is to minimise the impact of disasters”
© HI
Emergency Prevention

“Our goal is to minimise the impact of disasters”

With natural disasters on the rise, Jennifer M'Vouama, HI's Disaster Risk Reduction Advocacy Officer, explains the need for inclusion in NGO responses.

FOLLOW US